Radiology — Robust Image Analysis

Interpretable, generalisable computer-aided analysis of radiological images — detecting tuberculosis on chest X-rays and extracting stable quantitative biomarkers from CT — built to hold up across scanners and populations.

Partnerships

Federal University of Rio de JaneiroUniversity of ZürichMurabei Data Science, BrazilUniversity Hospital BaselLausanne University Hospital (CHUV)University of GenevaETH Zurich

A radiological image, a chest X-ray or a CT slice, is only as useful as the information a computer can reliably pull from it, and that reliability is exactly what tends to break when the scanner, the site, or the patient population changes. This work builds computer-aided analysis of radiological images that stays interpretable, fair, and stable enough to trust outside the lab, from detecting disease to quantifying it.

Major achievements

For tuberculosis, where high-burden regions have too few trained readers and opaque models fall apart on unfamiliar images, we route the decision through the radiological signs a radiologist would name and predict the diagnosis from those, reaching areas under the curve of about 0.97 on Montgomery, 0.90 on Shenzhen and 0.93 on the Indian set while keeping the reasoning legible. We then pressed the harder question of whether a model is right for the right reasons, and the answer was sobering: classifiers scoring a perfect area under the curve on the standard benchmark fell to 0.79 on an unseen external cohort, and their saliency maps concentrated outside the lungs entirely. Pre-training on a large, only loosely related radiograph collection and balancing the classes through the loss recovered both properties at once, lifting external performance to 0.88 while roughly quadrupling the overlap between model attention and expert-drawn disease regions. And because much of the world still records chest X-rays on film, we measured what photographing those films costs a lung-segmentation model: its precision-recall area falls from 0.99 on digital images to 0.90 on digitised ones, a gap any field deployment must budget for.

The same fragility haunts quantitative imaging. Radiomics promises to turn a scan into biomarkers, yet many classic features change value the moment the acquisition settings do. Imaging a 3D-printed anthropomorphic phantom containing four classes of liver tissue and lesion under eight acquisition protocols, thirty repeat scans each, let us score stability and discriminative power on the same footing. Three-dimensional deep features proved at least twice as stable across scanner variation as the steadiest hand-crafted family, and some three times as stable as hand-crafted features overall, while giving up almost nothing in their ability to separate the tissue classes — and this from a network trained on an unrelated anatomical task on entirely different data. Wavelet features were the most discriminative of all but the least stable, which is exactly the trade-off a biomarker study needs to see before committing to it. Across both strands the throughline is the same, and the tooling is shared through the open-source mednet library: for computer-aided radiology to help real clinics, what it extracts from an image has to be interpretable, fair, and robust to the scanners and populations it will actually meet.

Key publications

Supervised theses

Software